What should we be worried about? : real scenarios that keep scientists up at night
(Book)

The daily news, the Internet, and The Weather Channel inform people that not all is well for humanity. Whether the topic is politics, population, the stock market, or pollution, the outlook is dismal. Not since the gloomy predictions of medieval soothsayers has there been such concern about Earth as a habitat. This book by Brockman (literary agent; founder, Edge.org, CH, Jun'13, 50-5326) presents a whole range of matters to very much worry about, according to a group of thoughtful, well-informed scientists, economists, philosophers, and demographers. Some impending threats, like drastic climate change, can be staved off if society acts wisely and soon; others are curable malignancies, like superstition, illiteracy, and starvation; yet others seem irreversible, like the trend to homogenize cultures and the resurgence of religious frenzy. Sometimes even roads to solutions are wrought with undesirable side effects, like the "underpopulation bomb." Societies are now facing the possibility of extinction due to a slow decrease in population. This book is an eye-opener with unpleasant revelations that will make people worry even more than they currently do. Ignorance can indeed be bliss sometimes, for knowledge of this kind, especially when a reader can do little about it, can throw one into depression. --V. V. Raman, Rochester Institute of Technology

*Starred Review* Each year, Edge founder Brockman and Edge stalwarts mark the anniversary of the speculative online science salon by posing a far-reaching question as the catalyst for a multidisciplinary essay collection. Brockman introduces this year's substantial and engrossing anthology, What Should We Be Worried About?, by noting, Nothing can stop us from worrying, but science can teach us how to worry better, and when to stop worrying. The array of subjects 150 leading thinkers and scientists identify as worrisome is vast and varied, while the outlooks expressed in their pithy thought-pieces are provocative and enlightening. Psychologist Steven Pinker identifies hidden threats to peace. Cosmologist and astrophysicist Martin Rees shares his concern about climate change. Philosopher Daniel C. Dennett and science historian George Dyson ponder the risky vulnerability of the Internet. Biologist Seiran Sumner shudders over the dangers of synthetic biology. Neuroscientist Sarah-Jayne Blakemore considers how our rapidly changing world is shaping the developing teenage brain. Theoretical physicist Lisa Randall is one of many who fret that there won't be future funding for major long-term research projects. Water resources, viruses, low science literacy, and our failure to achieve global cooperation are all addressed with striking clarity. By taking this bold approach to significant quandaries, Brockman and the Edge contributors offer fresh and invaluable perspectives on crucial aspects of our lives.--Seaman, Donna Copyright 2010 Booklist

Those without enough to worry about will have fuel for many a future sleepless night after perusing this thick collection of concerns from 150 influential philosophers, futurists, and scientists compiled by Brockman, the CEO of literary agency Brockman Inc. and founder of online science salon Edge.org. The essays vary in length, from film director Terry Gilliam's wry, sentence-long "I've Given Up Worrying," to a handful of five- and six-page screeds. The subjects fall into predictable categories, from the dangers of our dependence on the Internet and the possibility of a technological Singularity, to concern for how technology could change children's brains and reduce the overall level of general knowledge. Security technologist Bruce Schneier and others raise questions of privacy in a world of commodified information; others worry about the rise of superstition and anti-science sentiments and the growing lack of informed science coverage in the news. Contributors run the gamut from science fiction author Bruce Sterling and technological sociologist Sherry Turkle to composer Brian Eno and physicist Lisa Randall. While some arguments are more compelling than others, Brockman offers an impressive array of ideas from a diverse group that's sure to make readers think, argue, and-presumably-worry. (Feb.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

Brockman, publisher of Edge.org, asked the planet's "most influential minds" to write a short essay on something that worries them, especially things that aren't on the popular radar. The book consists of about 150 of these essays, encompassing topics related to all aspects of science, plus psychology, education, and sociology. This very interesting work is well worth a listen for worriers and those interested in science. Readers Peter Berkrot, Antony Ferguson, Michelle Ford, and Jo Anna Perrin present the pieces in rotation and do a more than adequate job with the material; however, the content's implementation as an audiobook was not well conceived. Primarily, this is a title that many readers will want to dip into and read in a non-linear way, rather than power through from cover to cover, a type of book that generally doesn't work well in audiobook format. Also, some production issues were distracting: several essays are placed twice, and audio "wayfinding" snippets are misplaced on the discs ("this is the end of the CD..." and especially "this concludes What Should We Be Worried About?"., which inexplicably played on disc five, track 25). Verdict Not recommended.-Kristen L. Smith, Loras Coll. Lib., Dubuque, IA (c) Copyright 2014. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

As if we didn't have enough to worry about, an acclaimed website gleans sophisticated anxieties for our consideration from a cohort of well-educated, highly influential people. Each year, literary agent and Edge.org founder Brockman (Thinking: The New Science of Decision-Making, Problem-Solving, and Prediction, 2013, etc.) asks dozens of scientists, academics, authors and artists (in roughly declining order of representation) a thought-provoking question to which he invites a brief response. This year, the author asked what people should worry about that is "under the radar," or what is on the radar that isn't worth worrying about? In this collection, climate change and the impending collapse of the world financial system are relegated to supporting roles, giving way to a more eclectic hodgepodge of concerns, many reflecting their authors' professional backgrounds. The physicists tend to worry about the disastrous effect that the lack of public support for big science projects, like the Large Hadron Collider, is already having on future discoveries and theories. A number of neuroscientists are anxious about the effect of information technologies on the minds and language of young people. Few worry about overpopulation; in fact, several participants propose a projected collapse of the global population curve toward the end of the century as cause for worry about how the youthful minority will cope with a superabundance of seniors. A little of these worries goes a very long way, and reading this collection can soon oppress readers: Imagine 150 very smart people taking turns trying to outdo each other with bad scenarios no one else has thought of. Instead of reading straight through, dip in and sample the ideas of the likes of Steven Pinker, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Mary Catherine Bateson, Evgeny Morozov, J. Craig Venter, Brian Eno and many more obscure but no less erudite thinkers. You will be surprised, you will learn a lot, and indeed, you will have a higher quality of things to worry about.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

*Starred Review* Each year, Edge founder Brockman and "Edge stalwarts" mark the anniversary of the speculative online science salon by posing a far-reaching question as the catalyst for a multidisciplinary essay collection. Brockman introduces this year's substantial and engrossing anthology, What Should We Be Worried About?, by noting, "Nothing can stop us from worrying, but science can teach us how to worry better, and when to stop worrying." The array of subjects 150 leading thinkers and scientists identify as worrisome is vast and varied, while the outlooks expressed in their pithy thought-pieces are provocative and enlightening. Psychologist Steven Pinker identifies hidden threats to peace. Cosmologist and astrophysicist Martin Rees shares his concern about climate change. Philosopher Daniel C. Dennett and science historian George Dyson ponder the risky vulnerability of the Internet. Biologist Seiran Sumner shudders over the dangers of synthetic biology. Neuroscientist Sarah-Jayne Blakemore considers "how our rapidly changing world is shaping the developing teenage brain." Theoretical physicist Lisa Randall is one of many who fret that there won't be future funding for major long-term research projects. Water resources, viruses, low science literacy, and our failure to achieve global cooperation are all addressed with striking clarity. By taking this bold approach to significant quandaries, Brockman and the Edge contributors offer fresh and invaluable perspectives on crucial aspects of our lives. Copyright 2013 Booklist Reviews.

Those without enough to worry about will have fuel for many a future sleepless night after perusing this thick collection of concerns from 150 influential philosophers, futurists, and scientists compiled by Brockman, the CEO of literary agency Brockman Inc. and founder of online science salon Edge.org. The essays vary in length, from film director Terry Gilliam's wry, sentence-long "I've Given Up Worrying," to a handful of five- and six-page screeds. The subjects fall into predictable categories, from the dangers of our dependence on the Internet and the possibility of a technological Singularity, to concern for how technology could change children's brains and reduce the overall level of general knowledge. Security technologist Bruce Schneier and others raise questions of privacy in a world of commodified information; others worry about the rise of superstition and anti-science sentiments and the growing lack of informed science coverage in the news. Contributors run the gamut from science fiction author Bruce Sterling and technological sociologist Sherry Turkle to composer Brian Eno and physicist Lisa Randall. While some arguments are more compelling than others, Brockman offers an impressive array of ideas from a diverse group that's sure to make readers think, argue, and—presumably—worry. (Feb.)