Against the grain : a deep history of the earliest states
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
New Haven : Yale University Press, [2017].
Status
Central - Adult Nonfiction
900 SCOTT
1 available

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatusDue Date
Central - Adult Nonfiction900 SCOTTAvailable
Glencarlyn - Adult Nonfiction900 SCOTTChecked OutJune 10, 2025
Shirlington - Adult Nonfiction900 SCOTTChecked OutJune 20, 2025

Description

An Economist Best History Book 2017  “History as it should be written.”—Barry Cunliffe, Guardian  “Scott hits the nail squarely on the head by exposing the staggering price our ancestors paid for civilization and political order.”—Walter Scheidel, Financial Times   Why did humans abandon hunting and gathering for sedentary communities dependent on livestock and cereal grains, and governed by precursors of today’s states? Most people believe that plant and animal domestication allowed humans, finally, to settle down and form agricultural villages, towns, and states, which made possible civilization, law, public order, and a presumably secure way of living. But archaeological and historical evidence challenges this narrative. The first agrarian states, says James C. Scott, were born of accumulations of domestications: first fire, then plants, livestock, subjects of the state, captives, and finally women in the patriarchal family—all of which can be viewed as a way of gaining control over reproduction.   Scott explores why we avoided sedentism and plow agriculture, the advantages of mobile subsistence, the unforeseeable disease epidemics arising from crowding plants, animals, and grain, and why all early states are based on millets and cereal grains and unfree labor. He also discusses the “barbarians” who long evaded state control, as a way of understanding continuing tension between states and nonsubject peoples.

More Details

Format
Book
Physical Desc
xvii, 312 pages : illustrations ; 22 cm.
Language
English
ISBN
9780300182910, 0300182910

Notes

Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 279-300) and index.
Description
An account of all the new and surprising evidence now available for the beginnings of the earliest civilizations that contradict the standard narrative Why did humans abandon hunting and gathering for sedentary communities dependent on livestock and cereal grains, and governed by precursors of today's states? Most people believe that plant and animal domestication allowed humans, finally, to settle down and form agricultural villages, towns, and states, which made possible civilization, law, public order, and a presumably secure way of living. But archaeological and historical evidence challenges this narrative. The first agrarian states, says James C. Scott, were born of accumulations of domestications: first fire, then plants, livestock, subjects of the state, captives, and finally women in the patriarchal family-all of which can be viewed as a way of gaining control over reproduction. Scott explores why we avoided sedentism and plow agriculture, the advantages of mobile subsistence, the unforeseeable disease epidemics arising from crowding plants, animals, and grain, and why all early states are based on millets and cereal grains and unfree labor. He also discusses the "barbarians" who long evaded state control, as a way of understanding continuing tension between states and nonsubject peoples.

Discover More

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Published Reviews

Choice Review

Recent archaeological theories showing that the hunter/gatherer life is easier for most people than the agricultural life, and that agriculture, sedentism, and the origins of civilization neither arose together nor inevitably followed one another are revelatory to political scientist Scott (Yale) and probably to other readers, including other social scientists. Scott first condenses the best knowledge available on domestication, early state formation, and the relation between early states and the people of their hinterlands, and then looks at the human and ecological consequences of the state form. He concludes that domestication, broadly speaking, is control over reproduction; that cereal grains are the foundation of all early civilizations because they are easy to tax; and that infectious diseases of crowding are critical in understanding the demographic fragility of the early state. In expanding on these themes, he focuses primarily on Mesopotamia. While none of his points are new to this reviewer, an anthropological archaeologist, Scott presents them clearly, and his arguments are well-supported. Readers who don't know that the lives of peasants are nastier, more brutish, and shorter than those of hunter/gatherers, and that slavery accompanied civilization, will have their eyes opened by this book. Summing Up: Recommended. All levels/libraries. --Lucille Lewis Johnson, Vassar College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Powered by Syndetics

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: a deep history of the earliest states . Yale University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Scott, James C. 2017. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Scott, James C. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.

Harvard Citation (style guide)

Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: a deep history of the earliest states. New Haven: Yale University Press.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Scott, James C. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States Yale University Press, 2017.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.